Policies

Policies

libel or offensive remarks.

Editorial board members should be consulted annually to get their feedback. 

The Journals should have policies and systems in place to ensure that commercial considerations do not affect editorial decisions.

A general description of the Journal’s income sources should be declared (e.g. print charges, reprint sales).

 

II.     Authors’ Duties

The work should be as original as possible and appropriately cite the work or words and ideas of others. Borrowing of ideas and knowledge and research is also permitted provided it is cited correctly. If the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately. 

Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references. 

The manuscript should only be submitted and published in one paper and multiple publications of the same manuscript is unacceptable and completely unethical. Previously published manuscripts cannot be submitted under any circumstances.  

Should be limited to those who have made a substantial contribution to the body of work and to its genesis. Those who have made a significant contribution should be listed as co-

In any event, authors should ensure accessibility of such data to other competent professionals for at least ten years after publication (preferably via an institutional or subject- based data repository or other data center), provided that the confidentiality of the

Authors should use well reputed, substantiated and well-known sources 

Authors should provide a plagiarism report along with the submission of the

 

 

III.      Reviewers’ Responsibilities:

Manuscripts should be treated as confidential documents. They must not be disclosed or discussed with other persons apart from the editor.

An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic

Reviews should be conducted in an objective Personal remarks should not be passed and will be regarded as inappropriate. Supporting arguments in the case of disagreements should be presented.

Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Peer reviewing process is in place in order to help the editorial changes to be made in addition to ensuring the quality of the journal is maintained.